Do you like my answer to the question of what would be the benefits of finding another universe dimension?

They are not impossible to explain if you know about what speed of moving objects in the universe has to do with the relative moment they are moving in the universe at a certain point in time relative to the position they are at but not necessarily the location they are at. It is impossible to prove this if you don't count speed as a factor. We need to calculate the speed of the moving universe expanding and the speed of moving objects relative to other objects in the universe including speeds of galaxies, stars, and black holes relative to other objects and the moment in which it occurs to prove that the universe is either finite or infinite, and if we really have portals to other universes. Based on the Big Bang Theory and the position and speed of moving objects in the universe and the distance between certain galaxies not counting location as a factor in measuring the time of all of the moving objects in our universe, with measuring the densities of objects in the universe relative to other objects in the universe and how much matter or density can be supported by a certain mass we can easily prove that the universe is finite but contains and infinite amount of densely packed matter, which is why the universe is expanding at every moment we speak, but it is just going into more matter as it expands and making matter. It isn't actually going into complete nothingness, if that makes sense. Actually, there are other ways to explain the speed of light, and you can't base it on being the "same" for all observers, and you definitely can't base time on the theory of probability. And you can't say relative speed isn't important in measuring the time of an object. You can't assume the flow of time changes with speed just because of what you're saying. No matter what movement occurs in the universe based on all of the other moving objects in the universe, it is still happening at the same moment, which tells us the position and moving and speed based on certain objects in the universe based on their relative location for a certain given moment or time in the universe, which tells us that time changes with speed. It actually doesn't sound that weird or peculiar if you think about it. When you observe unstable particles very fast, time is not moving slower. Time is just the measure of the speed of moving objects in space based on the speed of other objects in space based on their locations they cover in a certain number of time relative to all other objects in the universe. The speed is just moving faster, but it is still at the same moment based on the other relative positions of other objects in the universe given in that exact amount of time. The time it takes them to move is less, but that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about the orientation of the atoms based on other objects in the universe around it based on a certain period of time, and as far as I am aware, the speed of the atoms has no impact on the time in which it moves. The atoms are relative to other objects at a certain moment in time in the universe relatively moving around it. Half of the particles will be gone after the fixed time period, but not because of the time it takes them to move. It's because the speed at which the particles are moving based on other elements and matter in the universe around it." It's not as if time is flowing much slower for the particles. You can't base this on measuring things by other objects on the universe that aren't moving. The same particles are moving fast and it takes them longer to move to a certain destination at a certain period of time, or location, but time isn't really flowing slower. They are still at the same moment and based on their position to all of the other moving objects in the Universe. Since all objects in the universe are moving, you can't base this complex scientific theory on objects that aren't moving. You have to think outside of the box. You can't base this theory on if a photon could tell time. You have to base it on reality. From any object's point of view, the time spent between the moment it leaves any other object in the universe based on the other objects in the universe doing the same thing at the same speed at a certain given time in the universe is the same. The time spent from going to one destination to another, well, that's a different story. The time that it actually moves proves that the time spent between the moment it leaves a star in another galaxy and the moment it enters your eye is the same as other occurrences in the universe, except for the fact that other distances are traveled by other moving objects in the universe. They still move at the same relative time and moment in the universe. Time is the same for all observers regardless of their speed is what I think you mean to say. Why even state something that you know is completely impossible?